Here’s the bad news about brass. Mining the elements -- copper, zinc, and often tin -- that make up brass contributes to global climate change by adding to atmospheric carbon. So at face value, the environmental impact of brass looks negative.
There is more. Two decades ago, a Kyoto University study determined that …
… found in the earth had already been incorporated into products, including brass architectural features. So these metals are endangered species.
So, does brass fit anywhere in a world increasingly focused on the sustainability and eco-friendliness represented by Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) standards? This is an important consideration because LEED standards have become the worldwide measure of performance for “green” buildings.
LEED ratings range from Certified (40-49 points) to Platinum (80 or more points). Surely using brass would take points off a LEED evaluation, right? Mining the metals is clearly unsustainable, correct? The carbon footprint from mining is obviously significant, nay? Maybe it’s time to give up on the romantic idea of brass entirely and go back to the same-old?
Not so fast.
It’s instructive to look at two non-metal architectural choices besides brass: vinyl and wood.
An immediate mark against vinyl is its makeup.
Its components are petroleum-based. It’s plastic and not biodegradable.
It can catch fire, and when it does, it gives off acrid, black smoke. Overall, it’s not an eco-friendly alternative.
On the plus side, it can be repurposed with effort.
This material is a little more complicated. Wood is a renewable resource, although unsustainable timber cutting remains a problem.
With the advent of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) in 1993, sustainable tropical forests began to look like a real possibility. To protect the rights of indigenous people and workers and to ensure conservation and reforestation, the FSC started certifying wood products with its seal. The result, the founders believed, would be a better approach to doing business as well as higher prices.
The higher prices happened, but the better approach to business -- not so much.
Tropical wood products jumped 15-25% in price at auction. But it looks as though tropical deforestation hasn’t been reduced much. Also, it appears the FSC label has been used used fraudulently to move illegal wood products.
So, wood is renewable, and sustainable forests are possible. However, those wood products cost significantly more, and it’s necessary to trace the timber back to its source to be certain it hasn’t been obtained illegally.
So, are there any factors could redeem brass and even make it preferable to other materials? Plenty!
Here are a few things to consider:
It’s too early to say whether upcycling existing products will be a viable alternative to current mining practices. One thing is certain: The current methods are not sustainable, just as the approach to sustainable forests isn’t working.
However, if forward-looking creative minds find a way to use sustainable architecture on a large scale, brass’s beauty, strength, long life, and recyclability make it an ideal partner for architectural trim.